Hindu Editorial Analysis : 27-December-2024

The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) recently approved a resolution proposing a treaty to prevent and punish crimes against humanity (CAH). This treaty aims to strengthen international efforts to hold perpetrators of these heinous crimes accountable, especially in cases where international cooperation is lacking.

Understanding Crimes Against Humanity

Crimes against humanity are some of the most serious offenses under international law. These crimes typically involve acts such as:

  • Murder
  • Extermination
  • Enslavement
  • Deportation
  • Torture
  • Rape

These acts must be committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack on civilians. The severity of these crimes calls for strong legal frameworks to ensure justice for victims and survivors.

Historical Context of Crimes Against Humanity

The idea of crimes against humanity was first officially recognized after World War II, with the Nuremberg Trials. These trials, established by the 1945 London Charter, prosecuted major war criminals. The Nuremberg Trials marked a key moment in international law, establishing the principle that individuals could be held criminally responsible for atrocities, regardless of their official capacity or the country they represented.

International Legal Instruments

Several key legal instruments define and address crimes against humanity:

  • Rome Statute (1998): This treaty established the International Criminal Court (ICC), which handles genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. However, its jurisdiction is limited to member states.
  • Draft Articles on Prevention and Punishment of CAH: Proposed by the International Law Commission (ILC), these articles recommend criminalizing crimes against humanity under national laws and establishing international cooperation for prosecution.
Why a Dedicated CAH Treaty is Necessary

While genocide and war crimes are governed by established treaties like the Genocide Convention (1948) and the Geneva Conventions (1949), crimes against humanity are only partially covered by the Rome Statute. This leaves gaps in accountability, especially in countries that are not ICC members. A specific CAH treaty would:

  • Hold individuals accountable for crimes.
  • Ensure states take responsibility for preventing such crimes.
  • Overcome the jurisdictional limitations of the ICC.
Challenges in Implementation

There are several challenges in ensuring effective prosecution of crimes against humanity:

  • Jurisdictional Limitations: The ICC’s reach is limited to its member states. Crimes in non-member states often go unpunished.
  • Political Obstacles: Some countries may resist international investigations or extradition requests due to political interests.
  • Weak Domestic Legal Systems: Many countries struggle with corruption or lack the infrastructure to prosecute these crimes effectively.
  • Victim Support: Survivors often face long-term trauma and stigmatization, and need better support systems, both financially and psychologically.
India’s Position on the CAH Treaty

India has shown a cautious approach toward the proposed CAH treaty. As a non-signatory to the Rome Statute, India has expressed concerns about the ICC’s jurisdiction and potential misuse of international criminal justice. India emphasizes the importance of respecting state sovereignty while ensuring accountability for crimes. Moreover, India’s domestic legal framework currently does not address crimes against humanity, which means the country would need to amend its laws to align with international standards.

Why In News

Recently, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution approving the text of a proposed treaty governing the prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity (CAH Treaty), marking a significant step towards strengthening global accountability for these heinous crimes.

MCQs about Global Efforts to Combat Crimes Against Humanity
  1. What was the primary aim of the recent resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly (UNGA)?
    A. To create a new international court for prosecuting war crimes
    B. To establish a treaty for the prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity
    C. To revise the Geneva Conventions of 1949
    D. To promote economic development in war-torn regions
    Correct Answer: B. To establish a treaty for the prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity
    Explanation: The recent resolution approved by the UNGA focuses on creating a treaty that would address the prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity, aiming to strengthen global accountability for such crimes.
  2. Which of the following acts is *NOT* considered a crime against humanity?
    A. Murder
    B. Enslavement
    C. Torture
    D. Theft
    Correct Answer: D. Theft
    Explanation: Crimes against humanity include grave offenses such as murder, enslavement, torture, and rape, but theft is not considered one of them under international law related to crimes against humanity.
  3. What is one of the main challenges in prosecuting crimes against humanity?
    A. Lack of global interest in such crimes
    B. The jurisdictional limitations of the International Criminal Court (ICC)
    C. The widespread approval of crimes against humanity worldwide
    D. The absence of any legal framework for addressing such crimes
    Correct Answer: B. The jurisdictional limitations of the International Criminal Court (ICC)
    Explanation: A key challenge in prosecuting crimes against humanity is that the ICC’s jurisdiction is limited to its member states, meaning that crimes in non-member states often go unpunished, highlighting the need for a dedicated CAH treaty.
  4. Why is India cautious about the proposed Crimes Against Humanity (CAH) treaty?
    A. India believes that crimes against humanity do not require international attention.
    B. India is not a party to the Rome Statute and is concerned about the political misuse of international criminal justice.
    C. India has already addressed crimes against humanity in its domestic legal system.
    D. India supports the idea of a global tribunal for war criminals.
    Correct Answer: B. India is not a party to the Rome Statute and is concerned about the political misuse of international criminal justice.
    Explanation: India is cautious about the CAH treaty because it is not a party to the Rome Statute and has expressed concerns about the potential political misuse of international criminal justice mechanisms like the ICC.

Boost up your confidence by appearing our Weekly Current Affairs Multiple Choice Questions

Loading